<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Conservative Blog - Latest Comments in Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://conservativeblog.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://conservativeblog.disqus.com/barack_obama_is_not_my_homey/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:22:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So far I like his voting record.  Not saying every line item but you always have to look at the over-all trend in votes and so far Obama far outshines McLiar's record.  And what's more Obama is not lying about everything as McCain has been doing over and over.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We can't afford another liar in office&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Kruger</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:22:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sylvia,&lt;br&gt;Didn't we get experience when Bush Jr. was elected........and what was the result?  Anyway you slice it it ain't good!  Now we have a 26 year vet of congress, running as a maverick who had dined with all the big time lobbyist in Washington.  Change will follow McCain to Washington?  Exactly what will change?  Maybe the number of dead in Iraq, but not much else.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David W. Walters</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:03:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Palin has thrown the "experience" debate into a whole new light, and it seems conventional wisdom is that in terms of experience the Republican ticket is right side up and the Democratic ticket is upside-down. But the question is which is worse:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Electing an inexperienced President. Note that he will be given 2 months between the election and the inauguration. In that time he can choose his cabinet and set out the game plan for the beginning of his term. He will take office peacefully, in a general spirit of goodwill, and (something near) more than 50% of the electorate will be (at least somewhat) pleased that he's President.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having an inexperienced President take office immediately during a time of crisis. Due to a sudden death (a la Johnson after Kennedy) might be more shocking, but also elicit sympathy making the job easier. Taking over after a career-ending scandal (a la Ford after Nixon) could be a worse nightmare, depending on how closely the VP is linked to the scandal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sylvia Gonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:46:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Osama Obama, what the hell is wrong with you? Is that what you honestly believe? Christ, you can't come to a website that claims that it is endorsing 'a new breed of conservative' and be a fucking Xenophobe.&lt;br&gt;Now- I'm a Leftist Moderate, not a Moderate Leftist (those guys are insufferable!) mind you, and every one of the bullet points of things Obama supports that you all are supposed to oppose, I agree with completely. I'm not just trying to make a point, I actually completely agree with what Obama has supported in the past. I'm always open to learning about different view points other than mine and you all might know something about all of this that I don't. That being said, if anyone wanted to tell me why I'm supposed to disagree with the above points, I'd be all for listening. Or, reading rather.&lt;br&gt;I didn't read any of the other comments, besides our good friend Osama's, so if someone else was already talking about this, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Valgron</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:06:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How often have you heard Obama respectfully say Senator McCain or President Bush when referring to them in his speeches. It is usually John McCain or George Bush. Yet, when during a debate with Hillary Clinton he was asked by Tim Russert about his endoresment from Louis Farakhan, Obama reverently used the term, Minister Farakhan as do the loyal Muslim followers of Farakhan.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Osama Obama</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For once I agree with you, toe...sorta.  I don't think there's any room anywhere for that garbage -- on either side.  Though I hardly think a lowly T-shirt site compares to the monumental and ongoing smear campaign against Bush.  Everything about the man has been parodied, derided and outright hated on a national level, whether it involves his policy or not.  The worst Obama has seen is a satire of what a rightist fringe thinks of him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have my opinions on what Obama truly believes, and for that I won't vote for him.  But the question to everyone else is...given his transition from hard left'er in the Primaries to centrist post-nomination, what will he do while in office?  He obviously has no marriage to any of his stated intentions, so there's absolutely no telling what the man will do as President.  I hope and believe that he'll be the centrist he's moving toward now (he's got term 2 to think about, y'know!), but we just don't know what he intends to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reaper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;bill,  that's about as funny as a truckload of dead babies.  people like you are rabid and forever wordy over  "left wing nuts"...but fail to see that you are the right wing version of this.  you are so over-the-top mindlessly ignorant that it boggles the mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:54:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Che Obama T-Shirts, HA HA!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theredaddress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theredaddress.com"&gt;http://www.theredaddress.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Nunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:51:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I could not tell you if this is infact truly from Jay Leno, I did find it on the internet, but who knows. What I do know, it is a fact, and we should be ashamed with ourselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--No matter what your political convictions are this is eye opener.  What a thankless people we are!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    Subject: Jay Leno on President Bush (Surprising)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;      Jay Leno wrote this; it's the Jay Leno we don't often see....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        As most of you know I am not a President Bush fan, nor have I ever been, but this is not about Bush, it is about us, as Americans, and it seems to hit the mark.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;   'The other day I was reading Newsweek magazine and came across some Poll data I found rather hard to believe.  It must be true given the  source, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;          The Newsweek poll alleges that 67 percent of Americans are unhappy with  the direction the country is headed and 69 percent of the country is  unhappy with the performance of the President.  In essence 2/3 of the citizenry just ain't happy and want a change.  So being the knuckle dragger I am, I started thinking, 'What are we so unhappy about?''&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         A.. Is it that we have electricity and running water 24 hours a day,  7 Days a week?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         B.. Is our unhappiness the result of having air conditioning in the summer and heating in the winter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;       C.. Could it be that 95.4 percent of these unhappy folks have a job?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         D.. Maybe it is the ability to walk into a grocery store at any time  and see more food in moments than Darfur has seen in the last year?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        E.. Maybeit is the ability to drive our cars and trucks from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean without having to present identification papers as we move  through each state?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         F.. Or possibly the hundreds of clean and safe motels we would find along the way that can provide temporary shelter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         G.. I guess having thousands of restaurants with varying cuisine from  around the world is just not good enough either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         H. Or could it be that when we wreck our car, emergency workers show up and provide services to help all and even send a helicopter to take you to the hospital.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         I.. Perhaps you are one of the 70 percent of Americans who own a home.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         J.. You may be upset with knowing that in the unfortunate case of a fire, a group of trained firefighters will appear in moments and use top notch equipment to extinguish the flames, thus saving you, your family, and your belongings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         K.. Or if, while at home watching one of your many flat screen TVs, a burglar or prowler intrudes, an officer equipped with a gun and a bullet-proof vest will come to defend you and your family against attack or loss.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         L.. This all in the backdrop of a neighborhood free of bombs or militias raping and pillaging the residents.  Neighborhoods where  90% of teenagers own cell phones and computers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         M.. How about the complete religious, social and political freedoms we enjoy that are the envy of everyone in the world?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         Maybe that is what has 67% of you folks unhappy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         Fact is, we are the largest group of ungrateful, spoiled brats the world has ever seen.  No wonder the world loves the U.S. ,  yet has a great disdain for its citizens.  They see us for what we are. The most blessed people in the world who do nothing but complain about what we don't have, and what we hate about the country instead of thanking the good Lord we live here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         I know, I know. What about the president who took us into war and has no plan to get us out?   The president who has a measly 31 percent approval rating? Is this the same president who guided the nation in the dark days after 9/11?   The president that cut taxes to bring an economy out of recession?   Could this be t he same guy who has been called every name in the book for succeeding in keeping all the spoiled ungrateful brats safe from terrorist attacks?  The commander in chief of an all-volunteer army that is out there defending you and me?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         Did you hear how bad the President is on the news or talk show?  Did this news affect you so much, make you so unhappy you couldn't take a look around for yourself and see all the good things and be glad?   Think about it......are you upset at the President because he actually caused you personal pain OR is it because the 'Media' told you he was failing to kiss your sorry ungrateful behind every day.  Make no mistake about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        The troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have volunteered to serve, and in many cases may have died for your freedom.  There is currently no draft in this country.  They didn't have to go. They are able to refuse to go and end up with either a ''general'' discharge, an 'other than honorable'' discharge or, worst case scenario, a ''dishonorable'' discha rge after a few days in the brig.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         So why then the flat-out discontentment in the minds of 69 percent of Americans?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;         Say what you want but I blame it on the media.   If it bleeds it leads and they specialize in bad news.  Everybody will watch a car crash with blood and guts.  How many will watch kids selling lemonade at the corner? The media knows this and media outlets are for-profit corporations.  They offer what sells, and when criticized, try to defend their  actions by 'justifying' them in one way or another. Just ask why they tried to allow a murderer like O.J. Simpson to write a book abou t how he didn't kill his wife, but if he did he would have done it this way......Insane!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Turn off the TV, burn Newsweek, and use the New York Times for the bottom of your bird cage.  Then start being grateful for all we have as a country. There is expodentially more good than bad.  We are among the most blessedpeople on Earth and should thank God several times a day, or at least be thankful and appreciative.'  'With hurricanes, tornados, fires out of control, mud slides, flooding, severe thunderstorms tearing up the country from one end to another, and with thethreat of bird flu and terrorist attacks, 'Are we sure this is a good time to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance?'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;             Jay Leno&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JarrodM</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:16:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Check out the &lt;a href="http://taylormarsh.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="taylormarsh.com"&gt;taylormarsh.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you guys are not doing much by preaching to the choir.  Use the evidence that Obama is not suitable to run this country (or any liberal) from our sources and try viewing the articles in Taylor Marsh's archives.  Plenty of ammo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hope to see you helping us in the fight against liberal blogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StopPreachingToTheChoir</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:11:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TO ANY castro's granma TOILETPAPER BLOGGERS ON CONSERVATIVE SITES: &lt;br&gt;your ideal site to read what you need, the "world" of social, national, global, programed, sodomic, blasfemic brain, ideas.  well, there is a site, matching perfectly, very, with you: granma, the same voting minds, like "choosenone" husseiNobama, like manuelnoriega people, like castro's, chavez, anabelenmontes's people,  and so on, shall never pass the security check on terror.  That's why even on popularity, with their own Media,  the mayority minority ruling conservatives, as currently happens, even with "the fatest fish" and foreing terrordictators or local actualiberal "icons", powerfully positioned, the best healthcare, houses, etc. eternaly can not pass half Bush's popularity % while Bush is not even campaigning... and wrowing, while Nobama grew ONLY 1% "since hillary".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave&amp;amp;mbgbloggers granmatoi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:23:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;reaganresistance@yuhoo.com.tadaa!&lt;br&gt;Mitt Romney showed the wisdom Nobama other would have in 100 years&lt;br&gt;Mcain (experienced, pro-war on sadam's formerUN petrosystems Iraq next to Iran swearing "vaporize any") - Romney (wisdom, terror-save economy performance innovator, ex: Massachussets)...&lt;br&gt;Mitt Romney supported John Mcain.  That support guarantyed former POW the candidacy to save media propaganda (for free and wich actualiberal's propaganda machinery elects 90's, 70's sama people anti-American, anti-God at schools, anti-Irak next to famous Iran war) Mcain did'nt have, and unknown if so today.&lt;br&gt;But is because of "littlethings" like sites&amp;amp;people like this,  + free Media resisting demachinery, Mcain recieved path to the WH (an anti-terrorist civilian or soldier know that kind of promisses involving God's eternal battle plan commitment).&lt;br&gt;+ Romney is a proven formidable Media-debater, God concept (an ancestral universal-celestial idea church, not to different to Catholic), economy innovator, showed wisdom by just do not hit Mcain, strategy opportunity to assalt ohNobama's propaganda machinery again,  even with hillary or a robot with the mind of santurronfidel "the political architect), even a totaly ilusionary I'm suuure it won't never happend bhNobama-"wbush" nightmare "team" (also I'm sure and put "my hands into fire" if do so") "wbush" "kissing chave$'s oropelesco petro-ring, "making Frodo's gesture and smile naightmare I had the other night woke me up".&lt;br&gt;I'm sure that it is not necesary JW Bush kisses Your Sanctity Pope's holly ring just to "let me sleep at knight without those "kind of stresses" in the middle of the mist (+ eatting full before sleep + the big soda)...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WE TRUST ROMNEY</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:52:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now we can all live a fuller life.  Just in time - it's OBAMAir!  It's expired air particles from the junior senator from Illinois - packaged for substantial consumer benefit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take a deep breath - of Barack Obama.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.obamair.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.obamair.com"&gt;www.obamair.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave K.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:07:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do people like Obama?  Because he is fresh and represents change to people. Everyone else is politically established.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If we keep putting the "politically established" in office time and again we have to accept that nothing will change.  Those people already have formed their political allegiance  to big business contributors and special interest groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simply re-locating them down the street a mile to the white house will not sever those ties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;McCain represents many years of those ties and will not offer change, only same-ole' same-ole' but from a different address.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is time to replace all of them...congress included.  Change can't happen with the same actors year after year.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Kruger</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:57:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He would have the 'government' take control of your lives. He's a Marxist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the life of me, I can't understand why people keep trying to revive forms of government that have been proved not to work. Marxism/Communism/Socialism have not worked in the societies they have been tried. Why try it here?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our system works, but people keep trying to make it into a system that doesn't work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The other thing I don't understand is that the very people who dream of a communist/socialist society are the ones who don't survive in those societies. Take Communist China - what happens to people who openly oppose their government officials? We don't know because they aren't heard from again. What about Russia? A group of journalists exposed that Putin had a mistress last week and their newspaper was shut down the next morning and those journalists are .... we don't know where they are. Why doesn't the NYTs have anything to say about that? Aren't they concerned that if they take control ove the gov't out of the hands of the people that they will end up where ever those Russian journalists are?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">beth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:31:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fabulous Obama voting record.  Seems as if he cares about the American people rather than merely enriching the coffers of the greedy, immoral scum that has driven our country into the present mess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abree</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s an article that really explains Black Liberal Theology.  It is evaluated and examined, and ultimately refuted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://biblicalthought.com/blog/truth-about-black-liberal-theology/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://biblicalthought.com/blog/truth-about-black-liberal-theology/"&gt;Truth About Black Liberal Theology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Harold Cerula</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a bit concerned about the lack of particiption factor along with his MOST liberal voting record.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Liberal is a four letter word at my house. Lbrl. See?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zachary</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:00:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the voting record info. Here's more Obama facts from &lt;a href="http://www.votestrike.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.votestrike.com"&gt;www.votestrike.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EARMARKS:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama joined with other lawmakers last year to obtain almost $100 million worth of earmarks for Illinois. Clinton worked with others to win $342 million in pet projects for New York&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CAMPAIGN FUNDING:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama, who last year promised to also accept public money in the general election if his GOP opponent did so, has since hedged on that vow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Public financing: Obama replied "yes" in September 2007 when asked if he would agree to public financing of the presidential election if his GOP opponent did the same. Obama has now attached several conditions to such an agreement, including regulating spending by outside groups. His spokesman says the candidate never committed himself on the matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ACCORDING TO HIS OWN FEC (FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION) FILINGS HIS CAMPAIGN HAS RECIEVED MONEY FROM:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Deutsche  Bank,  JP  Morgan,  Merrill  Lynch,  Capital  One,  Bank  of  Montreal,  Wells  Fargo,  Goldman  Sachs,  Butterfield  Bank,  Resource  Bank,  Bain  Capital,  Mutual  of  America,  Telemundo,  La  Pietra,  Sankatt  Investments,  Transamerica  Investment  Mgmt.,  US  Venture  Partners,  Sony  Pictures,  Warner  Music  Group,  IBM,  Lehman  Bros.,  AT&amp;amp;T,  Ticketmaster,  Alantos  Pharmaceuticals,  20th  Century  Fox,  Aragon  Global,  UCLA  Medical  Center,  AHMC  Healthcare  Inc.,  AV  International,  Fidelity  Ventures,  Clifford  Law  Firm,  CCMP  Capital,  Cypruss  Funds  Investment  Mgmt.,  Kaman  Group,  Solimar  Ventures,  Comcast,  Sterne  Assets,  Citilink  Investment  Corp.,  Third  Security,  COSTCO,  Sun  Capitol  Partners,  Tudor  Investment,  Madison  Investment,  EMC  Capital  Mgmt.,  Bel  Air  Investment,  Mirel  Capital,  Grandhara  Capital,  Lehman  Bros.,  GB  Capital,  Citadel  Investments,  etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FOR SPECIFIC AMOUNTS, ETC. GO TO: &lt;a href="http://www.votestrike.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.votestrike.com"&gt;www.votestrike.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:29:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For a list of thoughtful conservative articles regarding Obama, check this out:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/dnadna/gGBqql#comment-gGGzkv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/dnadna/gGBqql#comment-gGGzkv"&gt;http://my.barackobama.com/p...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:41:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have noticed that the media has not picked up on the dis-respectful side of Obama. While, in his speeches, he will sometimes refer to Hillary as Senator Clinton he always refers to our president as George Bush and not President Bush and to his colleague in the Senate simply as John McCain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conversely, when he was questioned in a recent TV debate by Tim Russert as to his relationship with Louis Farrakhan, Obama very reverently referred to him as Minister Farrakhan like the members of the Nation of Islam do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A Hannity Fan&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Hannity Fan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Obama is just like the rest of the liberals--They want to have their cake and eat it too. That is, they think that there is some magical way to achieve total fairness and equality among all citizens without any of the negative consequences.  It is unfortunate that so many Americans are blind to the fact that Democratic policies are so strikingly similar to socialist/communist policies.  They support a system of government that simply does not work. The quality of life we all enjoy is the direct result of a free-market economy and limited government.  There would be, however, one advantage to Obama being elected, the country might wake up and realize the danger a Democratic government poses to our wallets and comfortable lifestyles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mikeromig.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mikeromig.blogspot.com"&gt;http://mikeromig.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Romig</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:03:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Cassie&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for coming by Urban.  Yes, you are young. I am 34 and consider myself young too!!  : )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Urban Conservative</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;as a young(ish) (i'm not sure if under 30 qualifies as young these days) black--well at least as black as obama--conservative , i would have to say that obamamania is the most disturbing thing since the minisodes involving procuring hannah montana concert tickets. not only has this young man with an inept staff managed to show his/their utter lack of abiltiy to articulate effectively to foreign governments and press in the past week, but I hope his fraudulent nature has been exposed to some of those left in the places that matter--namely philadelphia. the man of hope who practices new politics clearly employs and surrounds himself with people who practice old school politics behind the scenes. anyone who falls for this is on the level of jim jones kool aid drinkers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;moreover,  yes b. hussein obama is the most liberal member of the senate. not even teddy or hillary would support depriving the LIVING babies of BOTCHED late term abortions the medical care necessary to survive. once his real positions, or lack thereof, are once and all revealed the novelty will wear off.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cassie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:29:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is not my Homey</title><link>http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/03/07/barrack-obama-is-not-my-homey/#comment-14025109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ simonesdad2008&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, you are correct my friend. Liberal is a very naughty word and it's destroying my beloved country. Look around you at our society. It's falling a part, fast!  And, when I say liberal, I am not referring to you. I am referring to the ultra left crowd like Code Pink, George Soros, &lt;a href="http://Moveon.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Moveon.org"&gt;Moveon.org&lt;/a&gt;, etc.  The reality is that we need to have people with different beliefs to balance out this country. Besides, if we were all conservative, who in the heck else would I poke fun at in this blog?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Btw - look out for my post "Liberal Minded, You've Been Blinded" later this weekend. I explain in full detail what being liberal minded really means.  I am sure it'll piss you off and many others too! LOL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;good day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Urban Conservative</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:57:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>