-
Website
http://www.urbanconservative.com/ -
Original page
http://www.urbanconservative.com/2008/07/08/the-politics-of-flip-flopping-republicans-and-democrats-are-both-guilty/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
This Country of ours is so confused because of all the BS that they are pushing down our throats be it the indocternation programs at our schools, or the crap the media is telling us that for a lot of people they are scared, so scared that they are blind to the erosion of our basic liberties that this country where founded on.
The Democratic controlled Senate has the worse rating ever under 10% of the people agree with the job that they are doing. The President has been persecuted to the point that he can't do much of anything, and the judicial branch is running wild in the streets just making shit up.
What we need are politicians that get in office and start downsizing the Government. There is no need for all of this wast that is going on. Our tax system is way more complicated then it needs to be, and is nothing more then a burden on the citizens of this Country.
They continually make laws that make it better for the criminals, and harder for law abiding citizens.
It is to bad that most of the third party candidates all end up being some sort of nut job. It would be nice to get some one in office that is not tied down to special interest groups, or other groups that have paid their way to be there so that once they are in office then can tell them all to fuck off, and do it right.
Any one else here a Clancy fan?? What we need is Jack Ryan, and his way of setting up a whole new class of politicians to run Washington. OK I know fiction, but dam why does it have to be so hard.
Your not missing anything, I think that you are just putting it together wrong. BHO wanted to get out of there because he thought that there was no way that we could win, or do any good. I mean come on, GWB is a moron right, anything he does is bound to fail..anyway. The bottom line is that BHO has egg on his face, because guess what, GWB made a bold move in he face of adversity, and our boys and girls in green/brown kicked ass. It was not always easy going nor was it always preety, but you know what we freed a whole country that was ruled by a dictator ship. A country where Sadam and his sons tortered, rapped, and killed at will with no consequences. Where Sadam, for what ever reason wanted the world to thing he had WMD. Get on Bush for bad intel all you want, but never forget that Sadam is the one that lead the world to believe that he had WMD.
Barack is now trying to save face, it does not look as good to call for a pull out when we are winning, and the world knows it.
Now W and Father Time are both on record as saying this is not an occupation. "If they tell us to leave, we will leave." Well guess what? And thus another ill-fated pillar in an already crumbling campaign has fallen. It's fun to watch.
I would not wast your time on simonesdad, he wants us to fail over there. He is one of these librals that wants to see the US fail. It justifies their extrem views that with out them we are never going to go anywhere. That the world just can not make it with out them telling us what to eat, what to buy, how to live our lives, and what countries we should try saving from the tyrany of dictatorship. It is funny librals campaign on the backs of the broken, and down troden on how they are going to take from the rich and give to them, but when it comes to people who really have no control over the dispare they are living in, they just turn thier backs on them.
The bottom line is that our forfathers trusted in the people, not the institution called government. The librals don't trust people, the thing that it is thier God given right to dictate to the rest of us on how we should live our lives. Hence the control they are trying to impose on us with all this green nonsense. Let's make it mandatory for every one to drive no more faster then 55. Not because it is safer, but because it will save on the ammount of oil we all use. You know what you want to save on gas, then you drive 55 or some small car, or invest in some new fuel.
Anyway getting back on topic. UC I think that you did a great job pointing out that it does not matter what side of the isle that these politicians are on. They all play the same game (So much for the change machine). They move to what ever side of the issues that they feel they need in order to get elected. Once they are elected who knows what they are going to do. Problem is that there heads are stuck so far up the special intreast groups arses that they can't see the light.
All we can do is pray that some day soon some politician will see the light and start getting this Government straight before all hell breaks lose. I truly do believe that there is a breaking point, and that is before we go to complete solicialism like these librals and Barack wants to take us.
On the first 3 paragraphs, all I can cay is "seconded," but I still like to pick their brains and see where they're coming from; we all have noble intentions, but we just have radically different perceptions of what America would best represent the will of the people. This perception is, of course, completely dependent on what we want personally and nothing else. That said, I still think we're right and they're wrong :P
On your final paragraph, the only change will come after unfettered Democrat control of all angles of government. This will force the Republican party through a reformation of sorts, re-identifying with their roots and the people. The intervening years of the Democrats completely screwing everything up will then help the Republicans reassert control, thus re inflating their egos. Thus the cycle of corruption will begin anew. At least I hope that's how it'll work. I'm not in the mood to see a civil war in my lifetime...
'Flip-flopping happens'
'What matters is how often -and why - it happens'
I'm more worried about the politico who never changes a position, even when circumstances change. That's not someone who should be making decisions.
About who is the bigger intellectual acrobat, I pass. Thankfully, it's a few months before the election - there's still time to dig into the records.
This global system of terror logistics feeds from politicians even insitu USA, it's easy to recognize and point them:
-they recognize 'legaly" terror related "liders" and build "ways" to sytematicly support them, ex: chavez, cuba, hammas, sandinists, manuelnoriega, etc., all where "recognized&legalized" with all rights by the anti-war on Iraq...
-they mega flipflopp but keep what the terrorists need against the USA security (and the world if there are no Bush or Mcain kind of liders to stop them, bringing easily more 911s opportunities)
-they are all related to leftists, marxists, anti-God, oilprices high, sexschools with gangland culture instead God, mega$candal cities, or more anti-war on iraq... to help Iran take easier iraq... and Iraq's oil...
-they have a massive terror logistic civilian army, for any potencial or opportunity to fisicaly invade the USA, borders, pensions, labor, education... and change History of victory for defeat (ex: Vietnam)
-they are predictable on terror help, that's why BHObama C H A N G E S now, risking to loose the anti-American supporters, programed by this terror logistic
-They deny any "old global plan" to repace public officials for terror helpers to "create sanctuaries" (ex: Miami's war on terror supporters have a heavier burden than their logistic people on jobs, family "legalities if they plant you political family related to terror to rule)
-their people are decades experienced programed, they never stop... until have miracle surprises like anabelenmontes
-
911 opportinity came by doing the things BHObama have mega declared about terror states.
You can't unilateral desarm the USA, you can't live Iran swearing to vaporize anybody, and testing long range missiles as a terror propaganda, unchalenched, roaming free thru middle east helping insurgents and keep killing US/allies soldiers and civilians, + Iraq oil. Iraq's oil is a good reason to have gone there,
If the terrorists see any "friendly enemy" they keep publicly motivating their supporters, Iran's nuclear public systematic terror plan attacks are proove BHObama ALWAYS will help them by "just" equalize these terrorists to the same level than the ARMY on rights and capabilities thru a simple "dialog" instead a surrender.
BHObama's all the way declarations on Iran and the rest of the terrorists, are their only hope, even if he "megaflipfloppes" and calls for ONLY BUREAWcratics "action reduced to paper diplomatic sanctions",.
Sadam ignored 16 ULTIMATUMS not "from Bush", but from ($adam's) UN, of course)
don't worry, Rush, Sean, Gleenbeck, Levin, Savage, mostly Foxnews, Ann Coulter, laura ingraham, laura Ingle, even Joyce from left, ReaganAmericans, the allies, many, so many people understand me crystal clear.
I don't write to you to understand.
read castro's toiletpaper granma, there you will easily understand want you seek to read, and post there too
you are really jumping of the deep end
And helping the enemy, by infiltration and traitors, the actual liberal is fully self-declared helper (by giving the terror state the help they need from the USA gov.) even well recorded "recognizing chavezes, torrijos, noriegas, sandinists, hamas, etc., and friendly enemies of the rest: norvietnam, norcorea, ussr, cuba, sadam, iran, syria...
reaper I just realized you said it yourself: "That said, I still think we're right and they're wrong" + a happy yellow face?, cheap treak, on this site?
(+ "my" opinions: a very experienced eMedia anti-terrorist pursued by terror logistics, actualy even), but a "work, adhonorem, by the way) that helped to catch "problems" like anabelenmontes, manuelnoriega, etc.), and you'll never even believe "what else"...
of course "I" make "no sence" for reaper, heathenheather, and others, remember, use castro's toiletpaper granma, blog there, the terrorists you help would "get close" to you, and chatt "closer", giving you tthe "chance" to "taste their danger"...
by the way, "sence" is what I feel, repeating these things some other better than me inform about, by a better English lenguage, like Levin, Rush and many, many others, "like satin stars on the sky"...
examples of terror logistics are (already e publicly denounced) childdren&family coyote (police related car tags bringing children even) lourdes suarez, martinez single, pedro galvez, alberto at alfred karr...'s (next letters, next gang sound-torture, legal by miami authorities, ok nazialfred?, gangeroalberto? judges pedrasa, ga burns, chr. perez even protected a self-declared farc terrorist stealing my ID, understand these things reaper?, on American soil?, and "say we are right and wrong" is all you teach?
reaper, we want to hear (read) your opinion an anabelenmontes's system, castro system, manuel noriega's system, hugochavez's system....
ilustrate us with "your magnificence", your "eminence"...
Thought I would post a funny and neutral video a friend sent me:
http://www.236.com/feed/2008/07/16/jib_jabs_mad...
Here is a link to few. Some more obvious than others.
www.obamatron.org
The Republican party is supposed to be the party of smaller government, lower taxes, etc... But they talk one hell of a good game, but won't deliver. Sorry, but I feel that the best choice would be to vote for a Liberterian candidate Bob Barr.
"Bop early and bop often." -Alphonso Carponzo
http://www.bop-o-rama.com
Your Bops really count!!!!!!!!!
Could I get your administrator to take a look at my website, www.thenationalintelligence.com and consider adding it to your blogroll. There are several postings there that would fit right in to your content. Many focus on Obama- -- particularly one that examines his involvement with Kenyan politics and a his support of a candidate for president there who struck a secret deal with a radical Muslim organization that could have turned Kenya into an al-Qaida sanctuary--- but also includes news and commentary on other topics: legal, social, international affairs.
I believe I write with a reasonable degree of authority on these topics: a background as an intelligence officer, a couple of post-graduate degrees with a heavy focus on international relations, and 25 years as an attorney.
Anyway, please take a look at www.thenationalintelligence.com and consider the request. If I can provide any further information, pls let me know.
"24-7",
"drink the kool-aid",
"tax and spend",
come on people... how about thinking for yourselves...come up with something less trite than these over-used catch-all phrases.
Yet a mere four months ago, the Clintons were questioning just those issues. Hillary's 3 a.m. ad asked whether a freshman senator with literally no experience in foreign affairs would be right to lead America and be commander in chief. Now the Clinton's are backpedaling faster than Michael Phelps' Beijing backstroke.
As I wrote yesterday, this is not really surprising. The Clintons cannot afford to be seen as undermining Obama's presidential ambitions, if they want to preserve their legacy. However it is striking how many crutches they have to provide him. No one would think it necessary to endlessly reiterate that John McCain loves his nation or is ready to be commander in chief. McCain's life's story speaks for itself.
The sore point is, Obama's actions also speak for themselves, but the tale is not a good one. Reverend Wright, Tony Rezko, Bill Ayers are but a few in a long list of close Obama associates that seriously put the candidate's judgment in doubt. People will ask themselves: If Obama is so patriotic, why did he sit for 20 years in a church whose pastor called for God to damn America? Sure, we would not expect all of the 8000 church members to get up and leave. But should we not expect better judgment of the man who wants to lead our nation?
I suspect the questions surrounding this pattern of judgment lapses will keep coming up. No amount of Botox can smoothen out these faults. The republicans will remind the public of this long list of questionable characters in Obama's tailwater and ask the question: Do we really know this guy? Is he who he says he is? Can we trust him to lead our nation?
Any intelligent, open-minded person will sometimes change his/her mind based on either new facts or a different perception of the already-known facts. That is not only acceptable but desireable.
Then, there is the person who quickly changes his mind, often depending upon whom he is talking to/ with. His opinion when he's participating at a seminar with CEOs will be different from his opinion when he's talking to bluecollar workers. I don't mean just a different style of speech; that's understandible and smart. I mean the substance of his opinions changes.
When you apply this criteria to Obama, you find him telling the Jewish leaders in Miami that Jerusalem will always be the undivided capital of Israel; then, on the same day, addressing muslim leaders and saying the status of Jerusalem is a topic for negotiation.
You will notice him telling the coalminers in Pennsylvania one thing on Monday and expressing very different views to liberals in San Francisco on Friday.
In November he took a very strong position favoring public financing of his campaign (if nominated). When he had the party nomination sewn up, however, he announced he would do just the opposite. He broke his promise. There was no explanation. No plausible justification. It was simply a naked change of position to gain a tactical advantage.
Obama has repeatedly stated he opposed offshore drilling for oil and/or gas. At least until recently. Now, he has begun to shift, squirm, and swiggle. That could be an honest change of mind. Actually, if he were to come out now in favor of such drilling, that would be a welcome change. Problem is. . . .do you believe him? Can you believe him?
What is his true position? Has he really changed his mind? Or Is he saying that just to get our votes? How can we tell?
If this comment resonates with you, you'll find more stimulating and intelligent reporting and commentary at www.thenationalintelligence.com.
yes people change minds ironically McCain was the biggest flip flopper during the campaign, I'LL SAVE THE ECONOMY and then the election bid was back on, his concern for solving the economy seemingly gone.
with the economic crisis it is clear that regulation is needed to slove the problem, it was a lack of intervention that caused the problem in the first place....